As book critics, our writing is a writing on writing. We respond to an author’s metaphors with countermetaphors; we criticize or praise a story by telling a story about it. My favorite work is always that which allows itself to imaginatively intermingle with its source text — to somehow match or channel or negate the energy of the text that inspired it. It can be imitative, competitive or collaborative; it can mimic or mock or scramble or counterbalance the tone of the source. It can be subtle or overt. But it will always have this doubled-over, creative quality: one memorable writer responding, in memorable writing, to another.

So basically Sam Anderson’s tenure at the New York Times magazine is going to be bonkers good, if this sounding of the trumpets is an apt preview.
  1. lacerationgravity reblogged this from bruise-dpur-ple
  2. bruise-dpur-ple reblogged this from rach
  3. rach posted this